hello perlisticers
(my first post)
i read in the perl6 book second edition something called
/Integer context/ and /Numeric context/
Ican understand the difference but since nowhere in the synopses i read
a word abou integer context im not
shore if these concept is thrown away. is it the case.
dear camels,
especially all german speaking camels.
im currently writing a perl6 tutorial in a wiki at:
http://wiki.perl-community.de/bin/view/Wissensbasis/Perl6Tutorial
Please join if you like or help when finished and nothing better there
to translate to english.
Its nearly half ready, vars, op
like i wrote here before i startet to write an perl6tutorial.
appendix C is made as an appetizer with some code examples in perl 5 vs
perl 6 equivalent.
the examples are so far:
- junctive and chained comparsions, err operator
- given
- sub signature
- minimal class with autogenerated getter/se
Thomas:
i just asked what you think are the best perl6 feature, to show how improved
the language in practical aspects.
the tutorial itself is currently very much in flux and rewrites
i can do much easier in my mothers tongue.
regards
herbert
hi richard
>(eg. How out of date are the Exegesis files?)
very *g* just use the synopsis *g*
herbert
(proton-ce.sf.net)
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-
or include a disclaimer that they are outdated as juerd sugested,
or do both. anyway this is an issue since google finds the A and E first.
im really intrested if im with juerd the only one here seeing this as an
issue.
thanks
herbert
proton-ce.sf.net
> herbert (>), Richard (>>):
> > >(eg. How o
> several concepts. That's elegant. But not easy, I think.
> I think it's not simple enough for this simple kind of problem.
>
exactly, my full support to thomas with this, perl was always about
keep simple things simple too.
herbert breunung
proton-ce.sf.net
__
> And to attract contributors, you have to have a convincing vision.
right
please make a decision for you to program in a language that has fame
or one that you like most. as moritz said the special variables are now
better sorted and some changes you write about are too far from perls
basic pr
> herbert breunung schrieb:
> > please make a decision for you to program in a language [..]
> > [..] try python. [..]
>
> Oh, just because I think that they've some smart design decisions?
> Why not steal them?
>
> BTW: Why do so much people say "
Larry Wall wrote:
Language design is hard. Let's go shopping! :-)
Larry
daddy daddy i want a pony,
oh wait the ponie is dead,
i hope i didnt say something wrong :-)
thats great because i actually use some parts for the article i
currently write about perl6 and i think some
musings about perl6 in theory could in this way flow back to the book
because i think its not written
the easiest way in some corners. but will see. great step
herbert
proton-ce.sf.net
as you all can see under
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi?tutorial
I started to get real with. The main idea is that i want to keep an wiki
and not make an POD
out of it because i think Hypertext is better for learning.
It is basicaly an english mirror of my german tut and thats go
Mark J. Reed wrote:
I do think It Would Be Nice If there were a native Perl6
DRY/MVC/OMG/WTF/BBQ webapp dev framework ready to go (go where? into a
webapp-oriented P6 distro, natch) around the same time that the lang
itself is done.
I imagine a port of Catalyst would fit the bill nicely.
As fa
Hereby I declare myself as the Pharao of the Perl 6 Documentation.
My first sign of regence will be most probably tomorrow the release the
initial stable release of
http://search.cpan.org/~lichtkind/Perl6-Doc/
this is a perly command line tool to read perl 6 related documentation.
The code w
newbeees the simpel stuff and simultaniously the Damians ,
last bits is what
really describes the goal of my perl tables
/
On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote:
I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo
perl magazine and maybe some perl.com
first of all thanks to Jonathan Scott Duff, you will be named in the
scribes section of the p6doc
documentation too and
to chromatic: i will name the authors normally like in POD and make a
link to perl.com/p6
section in the p6doc where sources of all docs are named.
Conrad Schneiker: about o
helping me with the
interviews. there will be new
content in the tables soon.
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi?perl_table
cheers and happy new year
On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote:
I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo
just a small question, what speak against this construct:
$min, $max = @a.minmax;
if we take TimTowtdi strictly, the anser would be yes :)
sorry for nagging but my question about existence of ($min, $max) =
@array.minmax also seems vaporized.
cheers
herbert
hello dear list attendees
after taken step 1 (reactivate p6doc and update to current state) and
step 2 (perl.com articles)[thanks to all authors]
, which is nearly finished (just fix some UTF problems) i have next plans.
there are some interesting docs in the parrot svn regarding perl6 that
a
currently just used for compile time constants like $?LINE allright so
far so good.
but why not use that for all constants like
my $?constant = 5;
so it's compiletime (even late compiletime like in eval blocks) fix
binding to a value.
i know i know we have
my const $var = 5;
my ithink my w
currently just used for compile time constants like $?LINE allright so
far so good.
but why not use that for all constants like
my $?constant = 5;
so it's compiletime (even late compiletime like in eval blocks) fix
binding to a value.
Because that variable comes from a different place
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
currently just used for compile time constants like $?LINE allright so
far so good.
but why not use that for all constants like
my $?constant = 5;
Because then you'd have to change existing code if you find out that
constant was not so constant at all, and you'd l
https://github.com/perl6/specs
> Commit: 6ef69b98d8afb6e33a271a466fb8e1beb7142eb8
>
> https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/6ef69b98d8afb6e33a271a466fb8e1beb7142eb8
> Author: Herbert Breunung
> Date: 2012-04-03 (Tue, 03 Apr 2012)
>
> Changed paths:
> M S28-specia
Thank you damian, i will apply that patch,
> Herbert Breunung asked:
>
>> what was you rational behind this decision.
>> I like it visually but my brain refuses to find any logic why only there
>> special vars should be different.
>
> This change stems from ano
heres my rationale.
i like the cute idea to name the special var like the general quoting op,
but no other var of that family does that (it goes bit like tamian rational
for $*pod). $~Q is just not descipive as $~Regex, which should be $~rx then,
or than should be $~Trans => $~tr and $~MAIN or $~Q
26 matches
Mail list logo
