($level) = $h =~ /^h(\d)$/; # Stringizes to element name
my $title = join " ", tgrep { not ref $_ } $h; # Flatten to list of
strings
print(" " x $level, $title, "\n");
}
would print a heading summary with indentation.
Perl can already do some pretty LISPy things, so why not some TREPpy
things, too?
Regards,
-- Gregor
.)...
Regards,
-- Gregor
Michael Lazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/30/2003 02:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Arrays: is computed
For C arrays, things get more complicated. Since there
are no true 'holes' in a primitive-typed array, th
but related) notations: one for unordered access, one for ordered access.
Any given object may support none, one or both.
Regards,
-- Gregor
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/30/2003 03:15 PM
To: Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Perl6 Languag
Sounds like a job for a bot!
(couldn't resist)
-- Gregor
Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/04/2003 11:38 AM
Please respond to duff
To: Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: "Miko O'Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
us
{
[self error:"Bogon flux exceeds limit %d\n", BOGON_LIMIT];
}
Also, there was a doesNotRecognize: method that was called by the runtime
system when method lookup failed. I presume you could override it to do
nasty things, but I never did that myself.
Regards,
-- Gregor
Seems like you are thinking along the lines of making Parrot support
Prevayler-style
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-objprev/index.html
stuff naturally and with less coding at the top layer. Is that where you
are headed with
this?
Regards,
-- Gregor Purdy
Sam
#x27;get' methods in one
place and teh Ellipse-like 'set' methods elsewhere. Circle
could inherit from the EllipseGettable but not EllipseSettable
(since you can ask for, but not set the semi axes).
Regards,
-- Gregor Purdy
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/
ontain the list of SAX events (or equivalent) required to reproduce it
(allowing
some lazy possibilities BTW).
Regards,
-- Gregor Purdy
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/26/2003 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Perl and *ML
I think tha
t will handle continue
differently inside the "do" part (right?), but it fits my mental model
nicely (this idea came from looking at looping constructs from Eiffel
as well as elsewhere and looking for the unifying stuff).
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 16:00, Luke Palmer wr
second block gives the
transform to apply to the elements before applying the comparison
block:
sort { $^a <=> $^b } { $_.foo('bar').compute } @unsorted;
Or maybe even something like this:
sort :numerically :as { $^a.foo('bar').compute } @unsorted;
Regards,
-- Gre
."
"that the string that contains a valid identifier" should be "that
the string contains a valid identifier"
* In "What you will command me will I do..."
"there's not reason" should be "there's no reason".
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
gt; undef. After that, the same static text
will appear in the header.
I suppose
... odd => sub { "Act, $act, Scene $scene ..." }, ...
would work, though.
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
tring...", but in the example that string
would be "A fellow of infinite j". The example output shows that the
extracted string isn't quite maximal. It tries to keep words together
(this rule is detailed elsewhere, but this example doesn't refer to
that extraction rule
at identifier,
but what would such a declaration look like? Where exactly does the
set of valid option identifiers *for C* come from, and are they
tied *to C*, or floating in a global space, free to collide
with other (option key) identifier declarations?
It seems like ther
ent of the initial field? If so,
are error messages generated if there is overlap?
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
The Exegesis mentions the Perl6::Slurp module, but I don't see it
on CPAN. Is it just a race condition?
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
lidity before the program starts"
But, since E7 doesn't come right out and say it, I'm asking for
clarification. Still could be that you are right and there is nothing
to see here, though...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 07:46, Smylers wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy writes:
ctly*? Is it an error,
does it have some heuristics to guess? What are the edge cases?
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 07:39, Smylers wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy writes:
>
> > In "And now at length they overflow their banks." its not clear
> > how an overflow fie
Damian --
Good. I don't remember where I first heard about doing it that way
vs. from the left, but the results going from the right to left
are typically better looking than from left to right, and I use that
way exclusively now.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 15:54, Damian C
ving
$foo .=someOtherMethod();
equivalent to
$foo = $foo.someOtherMethod();
when $foo's class or someOtherMethod() implementation doesn't do
anything special?
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 21:29, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:46:05PM -0500, matt w
27;t.
Vim also allows
< < to get «
> > to get »
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 05:39, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> Andy Wardley wrote in perl.perl6.language :
> > I'm so happy! I just found out, totally by accident, that I can type
> > the
Oh, and the form doesn't require you to do the
:set digraph thing. Its always available.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 06:16, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> For me, (vim 6.2), that is
>
> < < to get «
> > > to get »
>
> after doing
>
&g
,
-- Gregor
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 08:12, Luke Palmer wrote:
> David Cantrell writes:
> > A few days ago I briefly discussed with Nicholas Clark (current perl 5.8
> > pumpking) about making perl5 code forward-compatible with perl6. A
> > quick look through the mailing list ar
ture of Perl 6.
#!/usr/bin/perl6
... # Perl 6 stuff here
use 5; # or, whatever
# Perl 5 stuff here
no 5; # or, whatever
# More Perl 6 stuff here
use python; # you get the idea
...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 12:59, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 200
Brent --
Clever points are relatively high here, but I find the idea of
doing the notionally simultaneous parse uncomfortable. I really
don't want my programs subject to a hidden double parse cost.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 15:30, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
achy keen. If you pass it to a Python
interpreter, you get what you deserve :) You have used "use syntax"
which falls under the category of "# or whatever" in my message.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 18:51, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> Gregor N
26 matches
Mail list logo
