er, but it should be pretty extensible so
anything can "throw" its own error messages and still be easily caught
by regexes. It should also allow for easy localization.
Brian Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
print "$person{first_name} is $person{age}\n";
> print "$person{first_name}'s numerical grade is
> $person{num_grade}\n";
> $person{num_grade} = 0 unless $person{never_missed_class};
> if ( $person{num_grade} > 60 ) { print "$person{name}
> passed!\n"; }
> @temp = ($person{name}, $person{age});
>
>
> Dave
>
What if the hash keys we want to use are not valid scalar names? For example,
I've had keys like "total - female" as keys, but using the ^ syntax
would fail on this...
Brian Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'perl' or 'perl5'
then it should assume perl 5 code unless there's something that triggers it to
assume otherwise (I.e. the module keyword)
Brian Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 11:00, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2, log10, l
:123?]
>256:192.168.1.0 - base 256
>(...etc...)
>
I've got to admit that I've not paid alot of attention to this
thread...but does that mean 0x1234 and 01234 (octal) go away or is this
an omission?
Brian Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> other uncategorized:
&g
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:44, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On 2002-10-28 at 16:39:10, brian wheeler wrote:
> > [The below is actually from Larry, not Michael]
> > > explicit radix specifications for integers:
> > > 0123- decimal
> > >2:0110
and write my own code in non-Latin-1 environments.
I agree considering, this isn't APL and the problems people have had
mailing examples (let alone creating them!).
I've got to admit all of these operators are scaring me. Seems alot
like Brooks' second-system effect.
Brian Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 12:15, Larry Wall wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2002, brian wheeler wrote:
> : I agree considering, this isn't APL and the problems people have had
> : mailing examples (let alone creating them!).
>
> Nevertheless, it has already been decreed that Perl 6 progr
