se.
I missed responding to the thread the last time this subject came up, but
the more I see this syntax the less I like it, so I wanted to add another
voice to the dissention. However, if it remains official, I expect I'll
simply be naming my invocants, as chromatic has suggested.
Kurt
On 6/20/05, Juerd wrote:
> Or you can just get your "self" with a simple (module that does)
>
> macro self () { '$?SELF' }
And you could do the same for `./`.
Kurt
uot;interfaces" to me.
Follow the thread back. Objective-C had them way first, and their
ur-name is "protocols."
- Kurt
ing that close() will erase a graphical
rectangle on a display, not disconnect a filehandle or return "true"
if it's nearby.
So the useful feature of this abstraction is that, given an
anonymous object, you don't ask, "do you implement method called
so-and-so", e.g., "$anon->can('print')"; you ask it, "do you do the
things that a Window does," e.g., "$anon->implements('Window')".
So a class shouldn't inherit from an interface. It should
assert that it implements it.
- Kurt
On Feb 02, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2004, at 9:53 PM, Kurt Starsinic wrote:
>
> >>I realize this is a tad OT, but can anyone tell me how I can get Emacs
> >>to properly display Unicode characters? I expect that others on the
> >>list could benefit, to
On Feb 03, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2004, at 7:13 AM, Kurt Starsinic wrote:
>
> >No joke. You'll need to have the "mule-ucs" module installed.
> >A quick Google search turns up plenty of sources.
>
> Oh, I have Emacs 21.3.50. Mule is gone.
/qid=1090866301/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-7396197-3600620?v=glance&s=books
- Kurt
to
fit in with assertions rather well, and I like the generalized assertion
idea.
Kurt
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:23:34PM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
> That makes sense, but that would make
> %num_of_lines = @file
> not DWIM... of course that would translate into
> %num_of_lines = scalar @file
> so maybe that's OK.
In order to promote proper syntactical thinking, note that this is
sitors
> and easy searches in the graph based on object properties (but I could be
> asking for too much ;).
>
> DAGs wouldn't enough though, most XML tree representations aren't really
> trees, they're very cyclic.
Pardon me? Could you please provide an example?
- Kurt
On Nov 07, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Lacking a decent C++ compiler isn't necessarily a strike against
> VMS--to be a strike against, there'd actually have to *be* a decent
> C++ compiler...
Doesn't VMS have a /bin/false?
- Kurt
11 matches
Mail list logo
