;m not so
sure that "filter" is broadly standard, as Damian asserts, but maybe I
haven't used enough languages.)
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
I remember from C++. Debugging becomes more difficult when
you have to not only chase down things that are a Foo, but anything
you've compiled that might know how to turn itself into a Foo.
I tend to agree, FWIW.
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
obably that doesn't address the "is context is rw" issue. And
it's not clear to me what it would mean without something like "my" that
introduces a new scope . . .
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
ow in an extra season . . .
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.5.2
"P.e. nipalensis." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is a virtual machine
aimed at running all dynamic languages.
Parrot 0.5.2 can be obtained via CPAN (soon), or follow the download
instructions at http://parrotcode.org/source.html.
ode whitout using
threads or fork()?
I like simple things, i only need something return me undef is there
is no input,
IIUC, it's the read operation, not the open, that is nonblocking. You
might want to look at IO::Select.
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:53:51 -0400
From: Spocchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Hi, i'm writing a gui tool, I need to open a non blocking pipe in read
mode, to avoid the bloc
than
strictly necessary.
. . .
Larry
How about "daemon blocks"? That suggests to me that they are invoked as
required, and not necessarily in synchrony with their containing blocks.
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
case. The OUTER scope is
always the one defined by outersub, no matter how many calls back in the
dynamic chain it might be.
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
chained op implementation couldn't mess it up by
returning plain True?
My apologies if this is spelled out somewhere; I couldn't find
anything about this application of multiple-typing in S03.
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:22:20 -0500
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:19:33PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
> . . . but IIUC "and" is not short-circuiting.
"and" is short-circuiting.
Aha. I was misle
From: Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:25:58 -0700
Moritz Lenz wrote (on perl6-compiler)
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > but I
> > suspect people have good reasons for preferring underscores.
One reason (probably not a good one) is to use the same
m my perspective, the added visual complexity is not worth it.
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
From: Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:02:06 -0500
That sounds cool. Did you do it at the editor level, or at the keyboard
level?
=Austin
In Emacs; see rgr-c-electric-dash-mode in [1], or other similar
solutions in [2]. That way, I can turn it on for
From: TSa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:25:27 +0200
. . .
What's so different in $foo-bar versus $foo*bar, $foo+bar or
$foo/bar? The latter might e.g. indicate path variables.
FWIW, one sees "hyphen substitution" like this only very rarely in
Common Lisp code, desp
our contributors for making this possible, and our sponsors
for supporting this project. Our next scheduled release is 16 Sep 2008.
Enjoy!
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
548342800628721885763499406390331782864144164680730766837160526223176512798435772129956553355286032203080380775759732320198985094884004069116123084147875437183658467465148948790552744165376
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It does produces >300 spectest_regression failures, though, so I don't
claim the patch is right.
Parrot doesn&
From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:15:57 -0500
One of the big problems with Parrot's n_* opcodes is that they
often assume that the type of the result should be the same as
the type of the first operand . . .
I kinda thought it wouldn't be that
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:08:10 -0400
From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:15:57 -0500
. . .
All of the mechanisms I've been able to find in Parrot for
conve
erhaps
%globals{"foo"} --> MultiSub{["foo", 'A', 'B'] => Sub, ...}
just to belabor the point a bit.
What about a not so global multi:
multi sub foo(A $a, B $b) {...}
Thanks for clarifying,
leo
Is this really different? After all, the o
20 matches
Mail list logo
