Author: moritz
Date: 2010-08-13 11:03:22 +0200 (Fri, 13 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 31975
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[spec] small markup fixes
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Author: moritz
Date: 2010-08-13 11:32:37 +0200 (Fri, 13 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 31976
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S06] make MAIN short switches a bit saner
The variable name of a parameter is purely an implementation detail
of the subroutine, and shouldn't be a concern whi
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:38:31PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
In fact, jnthn++ had a talk at YAPC::EU the other week where he showed
how nested signatures can be used to make hierarchical matches. A
proof-of-concept module could simply be some sugar around this already
ex
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jonathan Worthington
wrote:
>
>>
> I saw a video camera in the room, but not sure when we'll be seeing the
> footage from that. In the meantime, the slides are at:
>
> http://www.jnthn.net/papers/2010-yapc-eu-signatures.pdf
>
>
Nice talk! One minor nit, and perhap
My understanding from synopses was that you get the Perl 5 behaviour if
you omit the signature on your function declaration (though I
unfortunately can't check as I don't have Rakudo installed):
sub foo { @_[0] = 1 }
my $a = 0;
foo($a);
say $a; # 0
Cheers...
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:06 -0400, Aa
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jon Murray wrote:
> My understanding from synopses was that you get the Perl 5 behaviour if
> you omit the signature on your function declaration (though I
> unfortunately can't check as I don't have Rakudo installed):
>
> sub foo { @_[0] = 1 }
> my $a = 0;
> foo(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/10 22:03 , Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jon Murray wrote:
>
>> My understanding from synopses was that you get the Perl 5 behaviour if
>> you omit the signature on your function declaration (though I
>> unfortunatel
