Author: moritz
Date: 2010-08-12 10:02:42 +0200 (Thu, 12 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 31964
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] saner defaults for :c and :p; without a previous match, $/.to blows up
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
==
Oha (>):
> after speaking with masak, i come up with some ideas about Buf
> i would like to share with you, maybe you can find them usefull
>
> http://register.oha.it/buf.pod
Just thought I'd weigh in here a bit. Oha's proposal consists of two
parts, each of which is interesting in its own right:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Oha (>):
>
>
> * Grammars define a hierarchical structure that seems to be perfect
> for encoding the packing of larger pieces of data, for example when
> serializing an object structure. Could one use grammars, or something
> very much like it
Carl (>>), Aaron (>):
>> * Grammars define a hierarchical structure that seems to be perfect
>> for encoding the packing of larger pieces of data, for example when
>> serializing an object structure. Could one use grammars, or something
>> very much like it, as a "modern" &pack template?
>
> A whil
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:38:31PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> In fact, jnthn++ had a talk at YAPC::EU the other week where he showed
> how nested signatures can be used to make hierarchical matches. A
> proof-of-concept module could simply be some sugar around this already
> existing functionality
Author: moritz
Date: 2010-08-12 21:10:33 +0200 (Thu, 12 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 31972
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] specify what .keys, .values and .kv do on Match objects
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
=
Author: moritz
Date: 2010-08-12 21:23:14 +0200 (Thu, 12 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 31973
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] attempt to clarify wording, and add an example
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
--
How does a Match compare to a Parcel?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
