Larry Wall wrote:
Or going the other direction, perhaps we're missing a primitive that
can produce a data structure with the type information stripped, and
then eqv might be able to determine structural equivalence between
two canonicalized values.
Often you still want to know the declared type
Darren Duncan wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>>
>> Or going the other direction, perhaps we're missing a primitive that
>> can produce a data structure with the type information stripped, and
>> then eqv might be able to determine structural equivalence between
>> two canonicalized values.
>
> Often yo
Jon Lang wrote:
> Right. Still, there are times when duck-typing, flawed as it is,
> might be exactly what is needed to resolve the problem at hand. I
> forget who or in what context, but I vaguely recall someone posting an
> article here that proposed the use of £ in signatures as a modifier to
Author: sorear
Date: 2010-05-28 02:10:37 +0200 (Fri, 28 May 2010)
New Revision: 30878
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] clarify :ratchet behavior with input from pmichaud++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
On 2010-05-26, at 8:52 am, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:22:36AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> : On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 00:53, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : > sub MAIN(:name(:$n))
> : > then $n has two names, 'name' and 'n', and we could consider all
> one-letter
> : > parameter names as s
