Author: lwall
Date: 2010-05-17 18:08:01 +0200 (Mon, 17 May 2010)
New Revision: 30667
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] Disrequire retroactive semantics on :ii and :aa
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
-
Over the past week, I've been using my scant bits of nighttime coding to
cobble together a pseudocode version of what I think the URI module should
look like. There's already one available as example code, but it doesn't
actually implement either the URI or IRI spec correctly. Instead, this
approac
nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote:
There are very few algorithms that actually benefit from using even low
hundreds of threads, let alone thousands. The ability of Erlang (and go
an IO and many others) to spawn 100,000 threads makes an impressive demo
for the uninitiated, but finding practical
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-05-17 18:23:41 +0200 (Mon, 17 May 2010)
New Revision: 30668
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] typo
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod 2010
Hi,
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Over the past week, I've been using my scant bits of nighttime coding to
> cobble together a pseudocode version of what I think the URI module should
> look like. There's already one available as example code, but it doesn't
> actually implement either the URI or IRI spe
Exegesis 5 @ http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/exe/E05.html reads:
# Perl 6
/ < - [A-Za-z] >+ / # All alphabetics except A-Z or a-z
# (i.e. the accented alphabetics)
[Update: Would now need to be <+ - [A..Za..z]> to avoid ambiguity
with "Texas quo
Tom Christiansen wrote:
> Exegesis 5 @ http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/exe/E05.html reads:
The Exegesis are historical documents, and should be treated as such.
(If any volunteer is around, submitting a patch that puts "HISTORICAL
DOCUMENT ONLY" in big red letter on these pages would be great
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-05-17 20:41:52 +0200 (Mon, 17 May 2010)
New Revision: 30671
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] don't use 'accent' to mean 'mark' as pointed out by tchrist++
rename :a and :aa to :m and :mm
regularize mm// to ms// to avoid confusion with new :m ignoremark
Author: moritz
Date: 2010-05-17 20:47:54 +0200 (Mon, 17 May 2010)
New Revision: 30672
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Str.pod
Log:
[S32/Str] update "sameaccent" fossile
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Str.pod
=
Author: coke
Date: 2010-05-17 20:49:57 +0200 (Mon, 17 May 2010)
New Revision: 30673
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Str.pod
Log:
fix typo
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Str.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spe
Ooops, took this off-list by accident.
-- Forwarded message --
From: ajs
Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: URI replacement pseudocode
To: Moritz Lenz
Thank you for your responses!
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > He
On Mon, 17 May 2010 17:20:28 +0100, Dave Whipp - d...@dave.whipp.name
<+nntp+browseruk+a2ac8a2dcb.dpuu#dave.whipp.n...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote:
There are very few algorithms that actually benefit from using even low
hundreds of threads, let alone thousands.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> FFFE and FEFF are used to manage byte-ordering, so they really shouldn't be
> part of a URI (URIs should exist in a context in which byte ordering is
> assured, would be my take).
Neither U+FFFE nor U+ is a valid character, but U+FEFF i
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Ooops, took this off-list by accident.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: ajs
> Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM
> Subject: Re: URI replacement pseudocode
> To: Moritz Lenz
>
>
> Thank you for your responses!
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mor
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> Exegesis 5 @ http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/exe/E05.html reads:
>
> # Perl 6
> / < - [A-Za-z] >+ / # All alphabetics except A-Z or a-z
># (i.e. the accented alphabetics)
>
>[Update: Would now
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
>
> > I had a hard time even getting basic code working like:
> >
> > token foo { blah }
> > if "blah" ~~ m// { say "blah!" }
> >
> > (See my question to the list, last week)
>
> Right. What works today is
>
> gr
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
>
> > I had a hard time even getting basic code working like:
> >
> > token foo { blah }
> > if "blah" ~~ m// { say "blah!" }
> >
> > (See my question to the list, last week)
>
> Right. What works today is
>
> gr
Author: pmichaud
Date: 2010-05-17 21:53:42 +0200 (Mon, 17 May 2010)
New Revision: 30674
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05]: Typo fix TimToady++'s typo fix in r30668. :-)
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
==
[Note: removed one CCer because the email address was long and complex and
looked like my mail client had hacked up a hairball full of experimental
Perl 6 obfuscation. My apologies if that wasn't actually a mail failure]
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:13 PM, wrote:
>
> The important thing is not the
nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote:
From that statement, you do not appear to understand the subject matter
of this thread: Perl 6 concurrency model.
If I misunderstood then I apologize: I had thought that the subject was
the underlying abstractions of parallelism and concurrency that perl6
> Why isn't that:
> /<+ alpha - [A-Za-z]>+ /
If you're asking why it's mentioned in the "Update:" section
instead of the pattern in question just being rewritten, I don't know.
What got me most was the assumption that subtracting A-Za-z from Alphas
yielded "accented characters", as though Alpha
21 matches
Mail list logo