When doing an analyse of a sample parse tree, I note that it is
cluttered by the reduction of optional subrules
to generate a zero length parse subtree. That is, rules with a '?'
quantifier matching zero time.
Suppressing such matching rules from the parse tree would make it
easier to read.
Additi
Author: colomon
Date: 2010-04-27 18:36:16 +0200 (Tue, 27 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 30483
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Spec] Note that the various minmax methods, subs, and operators return a Range.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Sp
Author: colomon
Date: 2010-04-27 18:38:35 +0200 (Tue, 27 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 30484
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[Spec] Range.minmax is now Range.bounds.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
--- d
Author: colomon
Date: 2010-04-27 19:41:29 +0200 (Tue, 27 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 30486
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[Spec] .bound should have been .bounds.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
--- do
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-04-27 20:35:06 +0200 (Tue, 27 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 30488
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] clarify that state is shared by recursion to the same clone
remove some ::= fossils
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:31:01AM +0200, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
> When doing an analyse of a sample parse tree, I note that it is
> cluttered by the reduction of optional subrules
> to generate a zero length parse subtree. That is, rules with a '?'
> quantifier matching zero time.
> Suppressing
