Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:50:21PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : I assume that 'Num' is meant to be a non-complex.
> : Then it seems to make sense to assume:
> : Int is Rat
> : Rat is Num
> : Num is Complex
> : or am I off again?
>
> Well, there's this little thing called Lisko
Larry Wall wrote:
but probably what the financial insitutions
want is special fixed-point types that assume a divisor anyway.
Would any financial institution care to comment?
Some (VAT tax) computations are defined, by law, to be executed
with a cetain precision. You have to be able to contr
