HaloO,
Ovid wrote:
In other words, I think we could get proper constraint programming if a
subset can mutate its variable. Otherwise, all assignment would need
to be wrapped inside of an eval and the code would be more bug-prone.
I must admit that I hardly follow that statement. Why are side-
HaloO,
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
In fact, I doubt that there's a way to completely avoid any possible
side effects on this closures. as the very first line of the closure
shows:
$_.inside_of(...)
This is a plain method call, there's no way to tell if this method will
change anything inside the
HaloO,
David Green wrote:
I would expect all of those to work the same way in either case. That
is, anywhere the sub is used as an lvalue, it could pass the rvalue as a
special arg, not just when using "=".
I agree. But I want to stress that the big thing is that a lvalue
sub---and to a less
