On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some object types can behave as value types. Every object can produce
a "safe key identifier" (C for short) that uniquely identifies the
-object for hashing and other value-base comparisons. Normal objects
+object for hashing and other
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+To return from other types of code structures, the C function
+is used. The first argument, if supplied, specifies a C
+for the control structure to leave. The C and will be
+smart-matched against the dynamic scope objects from inner to
在 2006/8/11 下午 3:00 時,Luke Palmer 寫到:
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some object types can behave as value types. Every object can
produce
a "safe key identifier" (C for short) that uniquely
identifies the
-object for hashing and other value-base comparisons.
在 2006/8/11 下午 2:35 時,Luke Palmer 寫到:
I think that standard functions ought not to have underscores *most of
the time*, because their presence indicates something that could be
better named or is miscategorized. However, for methods, especially
"advanced" or introspective methods, I think longe
Author: larry
Date: Fri Aug 11 08:41:18 2006
New Revision: 10828
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
2nd whack, with help from gaal++, luqui++, audreyt++, malaire++, and others++.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
=
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:28:08PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
: For other built-in types, I think underscore names are just fine. For example,
: metaclass methods such as "Class.has_method" should indeed remain as such. :)
That's fine--I don't think of anything behind the META curtain as "core",
at
recently, perl 6 development has taken the form of a multi-method
dispatch. that is, multiple implementations are under active
development. this includes pugs (in haskell,) v6 (in perl5,)
v6-Compiler (in perl6,) and perl6 (on parrot.) hopefully, each of
these returns the same result, a working[1]
Note: This reply is being sent to all 4 mailing lists that the
original was, though I am only subscribed to the first 2 myself, for
the benefit of completeness to the readers of the original.
--
As my initial reply, I'll bring up 2 recent discussions or Pugs
changes that affec
Just to avoid repeating some of the discussion, here's a link to #perl6:
http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2006-08-07,Mon&sel=110#l193
The discussion goes on and off for most of the rest of the page,
so you probably want to search for and highlight "todo" if you're
using f
On 8/11/06, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to avoid repeating some of the discussion, here's a link to #perl6:
http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2006-08-07,Mon&sel=110#l193
The discussion goes on and off for most of the rest of the page,
so you probably want
Author: audreyt
Date: Fri Aug 11 20:28:03 2006
New Revision: 10855
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* S06: dconway++ suggested that we still provide convenience methods
on Signature level, to reduce line noise in common "want" operations.
* Also remove a stray paragraph miscommit
On 8/12/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite[3]. the question is, should it be
moved into their own repository, or into the
12 matches
Mail list logo