On 7/20/06, Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Laire writes:
> S04 seems to say that a style like this can't be used by
> perl6-programmers:
>
> loop
> {
>...
> }
> while $x;
>
> I like this style, as it lines up both the keywords and the curlies.
As of yesterday you can get very c
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 05:03:32PM +0100, Smylers wrote:
: Markus Laire writes:
:
: > S04 seems to say that a style like this can't be used by
: > perl6-programmers:
: >
: > loop
: > {
: >...
: > }
: > while $x;
: >
: > I like this style, as it lines up both the keywords and the curlies.
:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:18:57AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> It ain't easy. Maybe we should just make statement modifiers uppercase
> and burn out everyone's eye sockets. :)
Or just give them some sort of syntactic marker ... I know!
loop {
...
}
:while $loopy;
eat :if
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:07:52PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: Or just give them some sort of syntactic marker ... I know!
:
: loop {
: ...
: }
: :while $loopy;
:
: eat :if $hungry;
: go_postal :when $aggravation > 10;
: .sleep :until .rested;
:
: *Everybo
Author: audreyt
Date: Fri Jul 21 11:40:37 2006
New Revision: 10348
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
* S02: rodi++ pointed out a nit:
"say q<< <> >>"
should print " <> " not "<>".
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Larry Wall schreef:
> Maybe we should just make statement modifiers
> uppercase and burn out everyone's eye sockets. :)
Or maybe
{
}.
while $x ;
--
Groet, Ruud
In a message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Ruud H.G. van Tol writes:
Larry Wall schreef:
Maybe we should just make statement modifiers
uppercase and burn out everyone's eye sockets. :)
Or maybe
{
}.
while $x ;
Actually, can't that be made to work already (already by the language
spec, not
Author: larry
Date: Fri Jul 21 12:52:51 2006
New Revision: 10350
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
s/loop/repeat/ for test-after loops
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> s/loop/repeat/ for test-after loops
Yay! That makes things very clear, with different things looking nicely
different.
Smylers
