On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ==Question 1==
> macro rxmodinternal: { ... } # define your own /:x() stuff/
> macro rxmodexternal: { ... } # define your own m:x()/stuff/
> With this, I can make my own adverbs then? Like :without, or :skip, and
> describe what each does?
Yes,
On 2/14/06, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't want to just skip tags wholly, because they do serve a purpose,
> > but only in a particular context. (Can be changed back to a "default"
> > if
> > changed to include html tags?)
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:35:18AM -0800, David Romano wrote:
> On 2/14/06, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't want to just skip tags wholly, because they do
> > > serve a purpose, but only in a particular context. (Can
>
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2006-02-12
Welcome to part one of this week's summary. Owning to chronic problems
with deadlines I've only got time to summarize perl6-compiler and
perl6-internals tonight; I'll do perl6-language when I get back from
$paying_job on Thursday nig
On 2/12/06, Yiyi Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For perl 6,
> Array and Scalar are in different namespace.
> So,
> class A { has $.a; has @.a };
>
> what will A.new.a return by default?
>
> An Error? or Scalar has a higher priority?
It seems to me that the best way to approach this issue is to s
On 2/12/06, Thomas Sandlass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IIRC, you can always create a new method for a class, even outside of
> > > its definition, simply by ensuring that the first parameter to be
> > > passed in will be an object of that type:
> > >
> > > method bark (Dog $_) { ... }
> >
>
