This week's summary

The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2006-01-01 Another year, another summary. You might think I'm going to summarize the events of the whole year, but it turns out that chromatic's already done it. So in the spirit of laziness, I'll just point you at his year end summary.

Re: Junctions again (was Re: binding arguments)

HaloO, Luke Palmer wrote: Which "reads nicely", but it is quite opaque to the naive user. I guess many things are opaque to naive users ;) Whatever solution we end up with for Junctions, Larry wants it to support this: if $x == 1 | 2 | 3 {...} And I'm almost sure that I agree with him

Re: This week's summary

ti, 2006-01-03 kello 13:57 +, The Perl 6 Summarizer kirjoitti: > Planet Perl Six is a handy news aggregator of several Perl 6 related > sources. > > I believe that is actually Thanks for the great summary! -- wolverian <[EM

Re: Junctions again (was Re: binding arguments)

Luke Palmer wrote: > Whatever solution we end up with for Junctions, Larry wants it to > support this: > > if $x == 1 | 2 | 3 {...} > > And I'm almost sure that I agree with him. It's too bad, because > except for that little "detail", fmap was looking pretty darn nice for > junctions. Not re

Re: Junctions again (was Re: binding arguments)

On 1/4/06, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I'm almost sure that I agree with him. It's too bad, because > > except for that little "detail", fmap was looking pretty darn nice for > > junctions. > > Not really. If I read the fmap proposal correctly, You didn't :-) > if any($x,

S3 vs. S4: parallel lists

I think there might be a discrepency between S3 and S4. S3: > In order to support parallel iteration over multiple arrays, > Perl 6 has a zip function that builds tuples of the elements of > two or more arrays. > > for zip(@names; @codes) -> [$name, $zip] { > print "Name: $name; Zip