Hi All,
Being a relative newcomer to all that is Perl 6, can someone tell me what
differences
I need to know in order to write/amend Perl 6 extension Modules as opposed
to
Perl 5 versions ?
I have downloaded PXPerl for Windows (which seems a bit broken to me atm)
and
wanted to start writing so
I'd have to agree.
I also think that .foo should always mean $_.foo in methods, without causing
any errors if $?SELF =:= $_ becomes false.
OK. There is a lot of historical threads on the subject and already a lot of
"legacy" in the Perl6 language.
OK - As I understand it, this is what A12 say
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:01:43 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:38:22AM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> > As I see it == is the generic comparison, and 'eq' is == with
> > coercing parameters (in Haskell it'd be
> > eq :: (Show a) => a -> a -> Bool or so... Isn't that lovely?
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 18:06:24 -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
> Yuval Kogman wrote:
>
> > - optimizers stack on top of each other
> > - the output of each one is executable
> > - optimizers work in a coroutine, and are preemptable
> > - optimizers are small
> > - optimizers operate
Hey! Welcome back our show, gay camels[1] in denial! On todays show,
those who can't shut up won't, and will send you another email!
Today's issues cover STM, and just that.
Perl6 should have some kind of
atomic {
...
}
going on, AFAIK.
W
On Thu, July 14, 2005 10:47 am, Autrijus Tang said:
> If this were a straw poll, I'd say...
>
> 1. Meaning of $_
>
> .method should mean $_.method always. Making it into a runtime
> error is extremely awkward; a compile-time error with detailed
> explanataion is acceptable but suboptim
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:24:21AM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> > There is a new generic comparison operator known as ~~.
>
> ~~ is just Eq, there is also Ord
Hmm, <~ and ~> for generic comparators? ;)
> and Show
That is already prefix ~ for that.
> and a multitude of other things, which are m
