On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:38:51 -0700, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think it's the cleanest solution, but it works.
Just out of curiosity, what do you think would be a cleaner solution?
And why would one not want to implement such a solution instead?
// Carl
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005
Some questions after reading S04:
Can last/redo be used outside loops? (i.e. with if or given)
Is a bare block still a loop?
Can loop be used as a statement modifier? (say 'y' loop;)
Can OUTER be stacked? ($OUTER::OUTER::_)
TIA.
Juerd
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:59:40PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
: Some questions after reading S04:
:
:
: Can last/redo be used outside loops? (i.e. with if or given)
No, though of course what "loop" means is negotiable. Effectively,
anything that captures the appropriate control exceptions is a loop.
B
Thank you for your fast and detailed reply.
Larry Wall skribis 2005-01-29 11:08 (-0800):
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:59:40PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
> : Can last/redo be used outside loops? (i.e. with if or given)
> No, though of course what "loop" means is negotiable. Effectively,
> anything that c
Carl MÃsak writes:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:38:51 -0700, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think it's the cleanest solution, but it works.
>
> Just out of curiosity, what do you think would be a cleaner solution?
> And why would one not want to implement such a solution instead?
