Considering that "proper" and common usage, not to mention strictures,
dictates a heavy insistence on 'my'. I will thus assume that creation of
lexical variables with 'my' far out numbers the creation of package
space globals. Should we not then have it where it's the default
behavior, and crea
Rod Adams writes:
> Considering that "proper" and common usage, not to mention strictures,
> dictates a heavy insistence on 'my'. I will thus assume that creation
> of lexical variables with 'my' far out numbers the creation of package
> space globals. Should we not then have it where it's the defa
Rod Adams skribis 2004-12-18 14:55 (-0600):
> Considering that "proper" and common usage, not to mention strictures,
> dictates a heavy insistence on 'my'. I will thus assume that creation of
> lexical variables with 'my' far out numbers the creation of package
> space globals. Should we not the
- Original Message -
From: Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, December 18, 2004 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: Auto My?
> Rod Adams writes:
> There are pros and cons, and it basically ends up being a design
> choice.
> > Well, at least when strictures are on. When they are off, the
>
JOSEPH RYAN writes:
> As bad of an idea that I think this is, I wonder if Perl6's reflection
> capabilities will be powerful enough to where a module/pragma could be
> written that would be able to do this? For instance, one idea was:
> lexically change the current grammar to a subclass of the gra
