On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:10:06PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: I might be happy to remove them, though people will write q:x instead
: of qq:x and wonder why it doesn't interpolate. What I think is fun is
: qq:x:w, which presumably runs the command and then splits the result
: into words.
:
: I kn
Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:32:58AM +0300, Alexey Trofimenko wrote:
: ah, I forget, how could I do qx'echo $VAR' in Perl6? something like
: qx:noparse 'echo $VAR' ?
I think we need two more adverbs that add the special features of qx and qw,
so that you could write that:
q:x
James Mastros skribis 2004-11-27 11:36 (+0100):
> Much more clear, saves ` for other things
I like the idea. But as a earlier thread showed, people find backticks
ugly. Strangely enough, only when used for something other than
readpipe.
The idea of being able to write
%hash{'foo'}{'bar'}{$fo
