Re: S5 updated

2004-09-25 Thread Edward Peschko
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:24:32PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 16:58, Edward Peschko wrote: > > > Ok, ok, I'll give you that point ... lets call them 'intimately related' and > > leave it at that... if you say "3 foo" and your algorithm goes: > > > > "3 foo" => 3 => "

Re: S5 updated

2004-09-25 Thread Herbert Snorrason
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:46:37 -0700, Edward Peschko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could even say that in the chinese case that if you have > > "?$B#3" --> 3 --> "3" > > that's a bug. It had *better* turn back into "?$B#3" when you do > the int to string conversion. That's a internationalizatio

Re: S5 updated

2004-09-25 Thread Luke Palmer
Edward Peschko writes: > I'd say that that's a caveat of implementation, sort of a side effect > of handling an error condition. By your criteria there are very few > inverses - you could say that multiplication isn't an inverse of > division because of zero, for example. Err, that's funny, becaus

Re: The last shall be last

2004-09-25 Thread Jonadab the Unsightly One
Richard Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Conflict with "last LOOP"? Hm, the context should be enough to >> distinguish them, no? (Hey, maybe they can be unified somehow -- >> "last -1" to skip to the penultimate pass through the loop? =P) > > That could be generalised, "next +1" skipping

Re: A..Z alternatives

2004-09-25 Thread Jonadab the Unsightly One
Andrew Rodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about BASIC? Aren't all the little kids today raised on BASIC? :) I don't know about the kids _today_, but for about twenty years starting circa 1980 most home computers came with exactly one programming language tool, and it was BASIC -- line-num

Re: Ordinals, Hashes, and Arrays, oh my

2004-09-25 Thread Jonadab the Unsightly One
Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ISAM? >From the RDBMS world, a kind of index I think, or something along those lines. MySQL for example has a type of table called MyISAM. -- $;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}} split//,"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ --";$\=$ ;-> ();print$/

Re: What Requires Core Support (app packaging)Z

2004-09-25 Thread Jonadab the Unsightly One
"Adam D. Lopresto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Jonadab the Unsightly One wrote: > > The question is whether any of that needs to be core, and I'm > starting to strongly think it doesn't. I was about to say that perl > should only go trying to figure out that the file is an

Re: Ordinals, Hashes, and Arrays, oh my

2004-09-25 Thread Uri Guttman
> "JtUO" == Jonadab the Unsightly One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JtUO> Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ISAM? >>> From the RDBMS world, a kind of index I think, or something along JtUO> those lines. MySQL for example has a type of table called MyISAM. it predates dbms s

Re: Why lexical pads

2004-09-25 Thread Jeff Clites
On Sep 25, 2004, at 10:27 PM, Larry Wall wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:01:42PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: : We've also said that MY is a pseudopackage referring to the current : lexical scope so that you can hand off your lexical scope to someone : else to read (but not modify, unless you are cur