On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:07:59AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
>
> 2) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, methods always
> assume they have *no* arguments. For methods:
>
> 2a) A method not followed by a left paren or colon has no
> arguments.
Just checking--whitespace
David Storrs writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:07:59AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
>
> > 2) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, methods always
> > assume they have *no* arguments. For methods:
> >
> > 2a) A method not followed by a left paren or colon has no
> > argument
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:02:13PM +, Smylers wrote:
: David Storrs writes:
: > Just checking--whitespace doesn't count, right?
: >
: > foo(1,2,3);# Func with 3 args
: > foo (1,2,3); # Same exact thing
:
: You quote Larry's text about methods, then give an example using
: functi
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 12:54, Larry Wall wrote:
> But we'll just have to shoot anyone who makes a wisecrack like:
>
> use parens :lisp;
Surely that should have its own pragma:
use parenths;
-- c
