I am not happy about the versioning proposal.
While A12 listed many properties that could apply to a a module such as
version, subject, author etc, the versioning declaration
class Dog-1.2.1-cpan:JRANDOM;
leaves me a little cold.
Issues:
1) Why does this only use Version and Author? Supp
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 08:16:30PM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
> Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote:
>
> >>> *{"Foo::name1"} = -> $a { $a->{name1} };
> >>
> >>If I read A12 correctly, this could be written as:
> >>
> >> &Foo::$name1 := -> $a {$a.name1};
> >>
> >
> >
> >Could be; that sounds somewhat right, but
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 19:52, Damian Conway wrote:
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > Now, I know that the Apoc on modules has not been written, and by that
> > time Larry will have thought of this, but I thought I'd point out that
> > some mechanism will have to exist in modules to indicate not only that
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:23:28PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
: Ten years ago I was perfectly happy to start all my perl programs with
: /usr/bin/perl5. Today, I would be quite unhappy if I *still* needed to
: do it that way.
In general it's probably a lousy idea to rely on #!/usr/bin/perl6 to
se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
> It would be a (roughly) zero growth option to simply
> switch to :x syntax for command-line switches instead of -x syntax.
And POSIX be damned!
--
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.
- Agent J, Men in Black
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:48:56PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
: > It would be a (roughly) zero growth option to simply
: > switch to :x syntax for command-line switches instead of -x syntax.
:
: And POSIX be damned!
And maybe we should rename POSIX to NEGI
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:44:57AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> One thing that occurred to me over the weekend is that we could fix all
> the one-liners using a similar strategy to the package/module/class
> switch. It would be a (roughly) zero growth option to simply
> switch to :x syntax for comma
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2004-04-26 13:02 (-0500):
> I know this sounds slightly irrational but I don't like using shifted
> characters to offset my command line switches. Also, that colon seems
> *way* overloaded. :-) How about = instead?
Overloaded, but similar to :pairs and s:modifiers.
Larry Wall wrote:
In general it's probably a lousy idea to rely on #!/usr/bin/perl6 to
select language since you want the version number to select the
version of Parrot you're running, not the version of Perl.
One thing that occurred to me over the weekend is that we could fix all
the one-liners u
why not add a -6 perl flag:
perl -6 foo.pl
perl -6e 'print "yahoo\n"'
-corris
On Apr 26, 2004, at 11:09 AM, Juerd wrote:
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2004-04-26 13:02 (-0500):
I know this sounds slightly irrational but I don't like using shifted
characters to offset my command line switches. A
> "Larry" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Larry> It would be a (roughly) zero growth option to simply
Larry> switch to :x syntax for command-line switches instead of -x syntax.
Larry> Any program that uses colon switches instead of minus switches would
Larry> then automatically be
On 4/26/2004 2:16 PM, Rod Adams wrote:
Larry Wall wrote:
In general it's probably a lousy idea to rely on #!/usr/bin/perl6 to
select language since you want the version number to select the
version of Parrot you're running, not the version of Perl.
One thing that occurred to me over the weekend i
12 matches
Mail list logo
