Austin Hastings wrote:
From: Rod Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question in all this: What does one do when they have to _debug_ some
code that was written with these lovely Unicode ops, all while stuck in
an ASCII world?
That's why I suggested a standard script for Unicode2Ascii be shi
Hello everybody,
first of all please forgive me if I'm using the wrong words - I'm not up to
date about the (current) meanings of methods, functions, etc.
I read the article
http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8042/cuj0002meyers/
There is stated (short version - read article for details):
I
Ph. Marek writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> first of all please forgive me if I'm using the wrong words - I'm not up to
> date about the (current) meanings of methods, functions, etc.
>
>
> I read the article
> http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8042/cuj0002meyers/
>
> There is stated (short ve
Scott Walters writes:
> On 0, Rod Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Also, isn't it a pain to type all these characters when they are not on
> > your keyboard? As a predominately Win2k/XP user in the US, I see all
> > these glyphs just fine,but having to remember Alt+0171 for a æ is going
Luke Palmer writes:
> Scott Walters writes:
> > This would lend itself a P5 backport that did overload on its argument, too. If
> > it found that the thing on the right hand side was also overloaded into the
> > same class, it is could use a single iterator on both sides, otherwise it would
> > tre
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:54:18PM -0500, Austin Hastings wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jonathan Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Actually, no; roles don't _need_ "suppress" or "rename" options to
> > disambiguate a conflict: the priority chain of "class methods, then role
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Scott Duff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:54:18PM -0500, Austin Hastings wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jonathan Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Actually, no; roles don't _need_ "suppress" or "re
Austin Hastings writes:
> > Hmm. The text and examples so far have been about methods and this
> > seems to be about multi-methods. Correct me if I'm wrong ...
>
> You're wrong. Consider my example, where via single inheritance we reach a
> "layered" list of methods, each of which replaces the pr
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 06:55:39AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Luke Palmer writes:
: > Of course you mean "æinteracting withæ other correctly." :-)
:
: Grr! That ruined that joke! I'd better get this unicode thing figured
: out before Perl 6 is released.
:
: Âinteracting with other correct
Luke Palmer wrote:
> Scott Walters writes:
> > Would it be possible to subclass things on the fly, returning a
> > specialized object representing the argument that knew how to
> > vectorize when asked to add? Aren't add, subtract, multiply, and so
> > on, implemented as class methods in Perl 6,
Austin Hastings wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > Actually, no; roles don't _need_ "suppress" or "rename" options to
> > disambiguate a conflict: the priority chain of "class methods, then
> > role methods, then inherited methods" provides all the tools that are
> > _required_ to remove ambiguities
Jonathan Lang writes:
> Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Scott Walters writes:
> > > Would it be possible to subclass things on the fly, returning a
> > > specialized object representing the argument that knew how to
> > > vectorize when asked to add? Aren't add, subtract, multiply, and so
> > > on, imple
12 matches
Mail list logo
