Jonathan Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Austin Hastings wrote:
> > Indeed. I like the idea of dynamic anonymous roles -- it's more
> > behavioral than anything else.
> >
> > sub print_it ($thingie must stringify()) {...}
> >
> > Definitely gets down to the lowest level quickly, which is
From: chromatic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 00:43, Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > Maybe as an alternative to
> >
> >role Stringify {must stringify();}
> >sub print_it (Stringify $thingie) {print $thingie.stringify();}
> >
> > you might be able to say
> >
> >sub print_it
Is there somewhere I can get the entire perl6-language archive in a tarball?
I am trying to work on turning the Apocalypses into story cards at
http://p6stories.kwiki.org. It would be helpful to me if I could search the
mailing list archives to make sure I incorporate any decisions made after
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael.Firestone) writes:
> As there is no search engine at this moment
groups.google.com might work for you.
--
Wouldn't you love to fill out that report? "Company asset #423423
was lost while fighting the forces of evil."
-- Chris Adams in the scary.devil
michael.firestone writes:
> Is there somewhere I can get the entire perl6-language archive in a
> tarball?
I personally don't know, but there could be somewhere.
> I am trying to work on turning the Apocalypses into story cards at
> http://p6stories.kwiki.org. It would be helpful to me if I c
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:48:46AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Well, most of the decisions you'll find in the "official" documents: the
> apocalypses, exegeses, and synopses.
Yeah, but those are lagging behind in syntax changes (for instance).
It helps to use the right vocabulary when coming up
At 09:25 AM 1/8/2004 -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:48:46AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> If worse comes to worst, you can always ask me. I manage to keep the
> largest amount of the language in my head with the most time available
> to answer questions :-)
Oh no, now *
Austin Hastings wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > Austin Hastings wrote:
> > > This kind of granularity does kind of imply a JavaScript-like
> > > ability to compose objects, too, no? (If you can compose
> > > requirements atomically, why not compose capabilities, too?)
> > >
> > > my $photon do
