Larry Wall:
> argument. In fact, ??:: could be implemented as an infix:?? macro
> that does a special parse looking for a subsequent :: token.
...which gives us another built-in's implementation.
macro infix:?? ($cond, $expr1, $expr2)
is parsed(/:w () <'::'> ()/) {
return {
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 04:09, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> Miko O Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations to Damian on a great opening in Ex 6. Anybody can spoof
> > the classic detective novel setup, but it takes real talent to have it
> > actually make sense in the context of a technical document.
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Brent Dax wrote:
: Larry Wall:
: > argument. In fact, ??:: could be implemented as an infix:?? macro
: > that does a special parse looking for a subsequent :: token.
:
: ...which gives us another built-in's implementation.
:
: macro infix:?? ($cond,
