Miko O'Sullivan wrote:
> The idea of discussion summaries has been well received, ...
I read this thread over the past couple of days. It's only today that,
having thought about it, an objection occurred to me. I've no problem
with people summarizing threads, but with this bit:
> The summaries
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:57:00AM +0100, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
> In the tradition of Perl concision, I would like newline to be a
> statement terminator everywhere it can: that is when
>a) the parser expects an operator
> _and_ b) we are not in the middle of a parenthesised expressio
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with stealing, er "borrowing" the good bits of
> reptiles though, is there?. I didn't think that perl was fussy about where
> it gets its inspiration from.
It isn't and never will be. We're openly friendly to all languages. But
Perl is also quite diff
Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Miko O'Sullivan wrote:
>
>> The idea of discussion summaries has been well received, ...
>
> I read this thread over the past couple of days. It's only today that,
> having thought about it, an objection occurred to me. I've no problem
> with people summariz
