Re: Array Questions

2003-01-15 Thread Simon Cozens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Lazzaro) writes: > Great -- then I have only one more question, I think. In the words of > a certain cartoon character, what's *this* button do? > >my $b is $a; I think at this stage it's probably worth reminding everyone that not every string of characters *needs*

Re: L2R/R2L syntax (was Re: Everything is an object.)

2003-01-15 Thread Simon Cozens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr. Nobody) writes: > Unicode operators in the core are a very, very, very, very, very, very, very, > very, very, very, very, very, very bad idea. We've done that. -- COBOL is for morons. -- E.W. Dijkstra

Re: L2R/R2L syntax (was Re: Everything is an object.)

2003-01-15 Thread Simon Cozens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes: > Ah, that's a different question. Having Unicode synonyms may well be > considered reasonable thing Sounds like the good old days of trigraphs. -- A witty saying means nothing. -Voltaire

Re: L2R/R2L syntax (was Re: Everything is an object.)

2003-01-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:05 AM + 1/16/03, Simon Cozens wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes: Ah, that's a different question. Having Unicode synonyms may well be considered reasonable thing Sounds like the good old days of trigraphs. I was shooting for the good old days of sarcasm that people no