Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:33:28 -0400
>
> I like the idea of this. The finer details, like returning what to
> do, could be more elegant. But the extensibility idea is golden.
>
>> To change how certain e
--
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:49:57
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>Almost. At least perl 5's macros look like C. Emacs' macro horrors
>make C look like Lisp...
This is because C is _clearly_ a dialect of Lisp . . .
-Erik
>--
> Dan
>
>-
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Erik Steven Harrison wrote:
: On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:49:57
: Dan Sugalski wrote:
: >
: >Almost. At least perl 5's macros look like C. Emacs' macro horrors
: >make C look like Lisp...
:
: This is because C is _clearly_ a dialect of Lisp . . .
Yeah, look at all the extra p
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20021020
I'm sorry to have to inform you that I've returned from my holiday (no,
base jumping and paragliding were *not* involved) and that this week's
summary will not be written by the estimable Leon Brocard. Sorry about
that. Leon is current
