--
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:06:50
John Williams wrote:
>We should respect default values if arrays can declare them.
>
>Perhaps there will be a modifier for operator declarations to declare what
>the default behavior should be. Otherwise I don't know how different
>behaviors for different
At 12:40 PM -0700 9/26/02, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Is that sufficiently vague?
>
>Not vague enough, because the current implementation manages to miss the
>broad side of that semantic barn...
The intention is to allow aggregates to have different default
I have always longed for a more flexible security
system that could limit what a part of code could do
in Perl.
In perl5 Safe.pm (and Safe::Hole) have serious
limitations and problems since it is difficult to have
the security-limited code (that executes in a safe
compartment) have use packages
Kv Org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
> I believe Perl6 needs a facility to run
> "compartmented" code (object-oriented and
> module-loading) that is tagged as to its permissions
> and "owner" ID. The goal would be to let such code use
> harmful actions only by calling permitteed outside
> funct
