Re: RFC: [] as the solitary list constructor

2002-09-25 Thread Janek Schleicher
Luke Palmer wrote at Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:09:41 +0200: Very good written text. > =head1 DESCRIPTION > > Because of the addition of the flattening operator, parentheses in Perl 6, > when used as list constructors, are entirely redundant with brackets. > Additionally, parentheses have one incons

Perl 6 Summary for week ending 2002-09-22

2002-09-25 Thread Piers Cawley
The Perl 6 Summary for the Week Ending 20020822 So, another week, another Perl 6 summary. Let's see if I can get through this one without calling Tim Bunce 'Tim Bunch' shall we? Or maybe I should leave a couple of deliberate errors in as a less than cunning ploy to get more feedbac

RE: RFC: [] as the solitary list constructor

2002-09-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [snip] Luke, thanks and congratulations on a well written case. You put into words exactly what I was trying to put into words myself. Now I don't have to finish this ugly draft I have lying around. -Miko --

Re: Paren madness (was Re: Regex query)

2002-09-25 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 17:27, John Williams wrote: > If I understand our non-conclusions so far, we're waiting for Larry to > clarify: > > 1) how to create a 1-tuple/1-item list? > > 2) how to interpret the flattened list context? e.g. given this: > > > $x = (1,2,3); > > @y = (

Re: Paren madness (was Re: Regex query)

2002-09-25 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:54:06PM -0600, John Williams wrote: > After testing various cases of x, I came up with one that I cannot > explain. Can someone tell me what is happening here (in perl5)? > > $ perl -le 'print "@{[ $a = ('a','b') x 3 ]}"; print $a' > a bbb > bbb > > or in other words