What Dan says. If you're interested, there are at least three options:
- a fairly well-developed compiler for perl 5 regexes (languages/regex).
- a less well-developed compiler built into the prototype Perl 6 compiler
(languages/perl6)
- a set of regex ops in rx.ops, suitable for starting yo
From: Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Had an interesting typo there. I put => insteaqd of ->.
> I wonder how much trouble that sort of thing is gonna cause.
> Maybe pairs can be disallowed or warned about where a pointy
> sub might be expected.)
I foresee a lot of problems. To my Perl5 eyes,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Chris Dutton wrote:
>
> This one actually came to me just the other night. Would it be possible
> in Perl 6 to create "anonymous classes"? Something like:
>
> my $foo_class = class {
> method new {
> # yada yada yada
> }
> }
Another one...
class Foo is Bar;
method a {
setup();
}
1;
# EOF
(Is the 1 still required? I think I heard Damian say it was going away.)
The question is, is this valid, if Bar defines a sub/static method
'setup'?
Is my instict right that 'sub' in a class is a 'class/static method' in
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Question: if the compiler *doesn't* raise an error, what happens? How would
> the following code be interpreted, even insanely? An endless loop perhaps?
>
> while something() => $_ { ... }
Changing the closure to use »=>« instead of »->« yields with current P6C:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 07:30:19PM -0400, Chris Dutton wrote:
>
> The only problem I could see, and I wanted to wait for at least one
> other opinion before mentioning this, is rewriting the above as:
>
> my $foo_class $foo_obj = $foo_class.new;
I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to do wi
Steve Find said on August 09, 2002 6:24 PM:
>Anyone happen to know where pushdown automata fit in this list? Can
>they handle context-sensitive, just context-free, or some other
>subset?
Mark Reed said on August 09, 2002 7:60 PM:
>To recognize a context-sensitive language I think you need a Turin
On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 01:27 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 07:30:19PM -0400, Chris Dutton wrote:
>>
>> The only problem I could see, and I wanted to wait for at least one
>> other opinion before mentioning this, is rewriting the above as:
>>
>> my $foo_class $foo_obj
