Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:44 AM +0200 7/28/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>> 2) Some Mops numbers, all on i386/linux Athlon 800, slightly shortend:
>> (»make mops« in parrot root)
>
>
> Just out of curiosity, I presume the (rather abysmal) perl 6 numbers
> include time to generate the assembl
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:44 AM +0200 7/28/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>> 2) Some Mops numbers, all on i386/linux Athlon 800, slightly shortend:
> Just out of curiosity, I presume the (rather abysmal) perl 6 numbers
After the bugfix in perlarray.pmc I can bring you new numbers, which are
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
> "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say that "If you have
> > Perl <= 5.005_03, "$a += 3" may fail to parse." I guess we can upgrade
> > that to "if you have < 5.6, you
At 10:23 AM 7/30/2002 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Just out of curiosity, I presume the (rather abysmal) perl 6 numbers
>We have already the same Mops as perl5, but additionaly 2.3 seconds
>overhead. Just running the byte code is as fast as perl5.
>
>Without jit, mops.p6 p
