Perl Documentation Project (PDP) BOF

2002-07-16 Thread Casey West
[Note: I've copied a few lists, but all replies should go to the perl-documentation list. Apologies if you receive this message more than too many times.] Open Source Convention (aka The Perl Conference (or reverse())) Date: 07/22/2002 Time: 8:00pm - 10:00pm Location: Grande Ballroom A

Re: hyper operators - appalling proposal

2002-07-16 Thread Karl Glazebrook
I still feel this adds yet another layer of inconsistency and confusion. I can't look at a piece of code and know what it does, without referring up N lines to the top of the scripts. How is the infinite loop problem any different from other Halting problems? Karl Christian Soeller wrote: >

Re: hyper operators - appalling proposal

2002-07-16 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:30 AM -0400 7/16/02, Karl Glazebrook wrote: >I still feel this adds yet another layer of inconsistency and >confusion. I can't look at a piece of code and know what it does, >without referring up N lines to the top of the scripts. > >How is the infinite loop problem any different from other

Quick Perl 6 regex question

2002-07-16 Thread Brent Dax
I was reading through the Monastery, and I noticed a node (about the line between what's considered Perl discussion and what's off-topic) that had this regex in it: m:iw/how [do[es]?|can] [I|one] @tasks in @non_perl_languages/ (Yes, people are already using Perl 6 regexes in text. :^) )

Re: Perl 6, The Good Parts Version

2002-07-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:52:58PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > Don't forget Apocalypse 5. > > Personally I believe the elegant and thorough integration of regular > expressions and backtracking into the large-scale logic of an > application is one of the most radical things about Perl 6. How does o

Re: Quick Perl 6 regex question

2002-07-16 Thread Luke Palmer
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brent Dax wrote: > I was reading through the Monastery, and I noticed a node (about the > line between what's considered Perl discussion and what's off-topic) > that had this regex in it: > > m:iw/how [do[es]?|can] [I|one] @tasks in @non_perl_languages/ > > (Yes, peop

Re: Perl 6, The Good Parts Version

2002-07-16 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 05:42:18PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > I don't know how Java and Python handle Unicode. Java has always been 100% Unicode from the ground up; it's in the spec. The fundamental char type is a 16-bit value, you can use any "letterlike" characters in identifiers, there's

loop and the super comma

2002-07-16 Thread Erik Steven Harrison
Long have I been a fan of giving pure Perl modules the power to change the rules and create a more built-in look, feel, and functionality. So, of course, I love %MY, I love real named parameters, I love the ability to create iterators that look just like native control structures. But while la