On 10 Mar 02 at 11:14:26PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
> i really think that the printf format spec is so standard and ingrained
> that changing it with # for % or requiring \% is not a good idea.
>
> but then again, backwards compatibility is not a rule you must always
> obey. i just think in this case
On 10 Mar 02 at 11:14:26PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
> i really think that the printf format spec is so standard and ingrained
> that changing it with # for % or requiring \% is not a good idea.
>
> but then again, backwards compatibility is not a rule you must always
> obey. i just think in this case
Hello everyone.
I just subscribed to this list. My name's Luke and I'm a perl
devotee. And I'm starting out with a bang. Here goes:
I have just read through exegesis 3, and I found the bit about
defining your own new operators (eg. operator:*#@&) to be a little
strange. Not confusing, but esoter
