On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
>
> Glenn wrote:
>
>> > Have I missed anything?
>>
>> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>> Perl 6 could provide a pragma to produce a warning on the first
>> run-time auto-numerificat
Aaron Sherman writes:
: On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
: >
: > Glenn wrote:
: >
: >> > Have I missed anything?
: >>
: >> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
: >>
: >>[snip]
: >>
: >> Perl 6 could provide a pragma to produce a warning o
Larry Wall wrote:
> Aaron Sherman writes:
> : On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> : >
> : > Glenn wrote:
> : >
> : >> > Have I missed anything?
> : >>
> : >> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
> : >>
> : >>[snip]
> : >>
> : >> Perl 6 coul
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> So then the lexically scoped operator:+ wouldn't be able to achieve
> the goal of my suggested implicit numerification warning... the goal
> being the ability to ensure that there are no implicit numerifications,
> that all numeri
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
> > So then the lexically scoped operator:+ wouldn't be able to achieve
> > the goal of my suggested implicit numerification warning... the goal
> > being the ability to ensure that there are no implicit num
Piers Cawley has written a nice article entitled: "Perl 6 : Not Just For
Damians".
If the hair on the back of your neck rises when thinking about Perl 6, or
even if it doesn't... give it a read.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/10/23/damians.html
> "GG" == Garrett Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GG> Piers Cawley has written a nice article entitled: "Perl 6 : Not
GG> Just For Damians".
GG> If the hair on the back of your neck rises when thinking about
GG> Perl 6, or even if it doesn't... give it a read.
GG> http://www.pe
