Nicholas Clark writes:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:54:15PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> > in the same form if it does come back. So consider 6.0 its usage
> > deprecation cycle, so we can redefine its meaning (if we decide to).
>
> I don't see why study needs a
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:54:15PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> in the same form if it does come back. So consider 6.0 its usage
> deprecation cycle, so we can redefine its meaning (if we decide to).
I don't see why study needs a deprecation cycle when length doesn't get one.
It
Rod Adams writes:
> Luke Palmer wrote:
> >Ummm... yeah, keep a function around if it's not currently implemented.
> >I don't think so.
> >
> I see that as preferable to saying "we had it in 5.10, we dropped it in
> 6.0, then added it back in for 6.2."
Umm... your statement isn't quite so shock
Luke Palmer wrote:
Rod Adams writes:
C is an odd sort of function. AFAIK, it's the only optimization
hint that we have.
Will the P6RE even use this information, and is it worth keeping?
My gut feeling tells me that it will be useful again around 6.2, and we
should keep it around until then as
it around until then as a potential no-op.
Ummm... yeah, keep a function around if it's not currently implemented.
I don't think so.
When we do implement it, we can put it in as a method on Str.
$string.=study;
Luke
C is an odd sort of function. AFAIK, it's the only optimization
hint that we have.
Will the P6RE even use this information, and is it worth keeping?
My gut feeling tells me that it will be useful again around 6.2, and we
should keep it around until then as a potential no-op.
Comments?
-- Rod Ad
sort of thing automatically without a study, at least
with respect to the first character that could match. Of course, it
didn't do it with regular expressions in an array, but rather in
a "switch" structure. And you had to bunch your tests right. If
your regular expressions were
title: study a list of regexes
David Nicol.
Aug 21
version 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes I have a group of regexen, and I would like to know
which ones will match.
Current practice is to "study" $situation and then grep them:
example a:
study $situation;
@matche
