Re: r31735 -[spec] Say a bit about Numeric operators and Bridge.

2010-07-16 Thread Minimiscience
On 16 Jul 2010, at 14:39, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: Because all C types are well-ordered Oh, they are? Just how are we implementing that? says that the de facto standard foundations of mathematics are insufficient to define a formula for

Re: r31735 -[spec] Say a bit about Numeric operators and Bridge.

2010-07-16 Thread Darren Duncan
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: Author: colomon Date: 2010-07-16 20:39:33 +0200 (Fri, 16 Jul 2010) New Revision: 31735 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod Log: [spec] Say a bit about Numeric operators and Bridge. +Users who provide their own scalar real numeric typ

r31735 -[spec] Say a bit about Numeric operators and Bridge.

2010-07-16 Thread pugs-commits
Author: colomon Date: 2010-07-16 20:39:33 +0200 (Fri, 16 Jul 2010) New Revision: 31735 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod Log: [spec] Say a bit about Numeric operators and Bridge. Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod =