Re: r31054 -[S03] suggestions from dataweaver++

2010-06-02 Thread yary
And while we're at it with expanding examples, can we use string concatenation instead of addition? It makes following what's happening easier. eg, +1 on that prior post. -y

Re: r31054 -[S03] suggestions from dataweaver++

2010-06-02 Thread Jon Lang
wrote: > +Regardless of whether the dwim is forced or emergent from the shapes > +of the arrays, once the side to dwim on has been chosen, the dwim > +semantics on the dwimmy side are always: > + > +    (@dwimmyside xx *).batch(@otherside.elems) > + > +This produces a list the same length as the c

r31054 -[S03] suggestions from dataweaver++

2010-06-02 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2010-06-02 20:19:54 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010) New Revision: 31054 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] suggestions from dataweaver++ more refinements to the description of the dwim semantics Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod =