>>> + rhyme((1,2),3,:mice) # rhyme has 2 arguments
>>
>> Should that say 3 arguments?
I believe so.
>> (If not, please can somebody clarify what
>> the 2 arguments are.)
>
> (1,2) and 3. Named arguments ("mice" in this case) are handled separately.
That interpretation is not consistent wi
On Feb 17, 2010, at 17:18 , Smylers wrote:
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
Author: lwall
+++ docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod2010-02-17 19:15:34 UTC (rev 29768)
+rhyme((1,2),3,:mice) # rhyme has 2 arguments
Should that say 3 arguments? (If not, please can somebody clarify
w
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
> Author: lwall
> +++ docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod 2010-02-17 19:15:34 UTC (rev 29768)
>
> +rhyme((1,2),3,:mice) # rhyme has 2 arguments
Should that say 3 arguments? (If not, please can somebody clarify what
the 2 arguments are.)
Thanks.
Smyler
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-02-17 20:15:34 +0100 (Wed, 17 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 29768
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S02,S04] more clarification of when parcels are and aren't used.
Use "argument" as a technical term meaning either a real parcel o
