Mark J. Reed wrote:
I think there's some confusion around the term "epoch" in this doc.
TAI is not an "epoch", and neither is a time value measured in fixed
units from some starting point. The starting point is the epoch. One
may speak of the UNIX epoch (January 1, 1970 at midnight GMT), but th
Em Qua, 2009-09-09 às 09:07 -0400, Mark J. Reed escreveu:
> I would change the doc to refer to TAI as a "time scale", and also
> avoid referring to the numerical value of an Instant as an "epoch".
I knew there was something wrong in my use of that terms, please fix it
if you like...
daniel
I think there's some confusion around the term "epoch" in this doc.
TAI is not an "epoch", and neither is a time value measured in fixed
units from some starting point. The starting point is the epoch. One
may speak of the UNIX epoch (January 1, 1970 at midnight GMT), but the
current time_t value
Author: ruoso
Date: 2009-09-09 14:33:35 +0200 (Wed, 09 Sep 2009)
New Revision: 28213
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Temporal.pod
Log:
[spec-S32-Temporal] uses Instant instead of Rat for the return of time(), Allow
base Duration type to work with TAI-seconds delegating to Gregori
