TSa skribis 2005-09-22 14:55 (+0200):
> Why not simply:
> loopbody:
Because I don't like non-block labels. It reminds me too much of
bad-goto.
This, and I fear this would have bad performance. That's based on
nothing, though.
> And I hope we all agree, that goto behind the scenes is
> not
HaloO,
Juerd wrote:
Both recently discussed situations with blocks can be solved by
introducing a way to leave the current block and resume it elsewhere.
With first class code types, &_ and &label beeing bound lexically
to the current instance of the sub class, the set of current control
flow
Both recently discussed situations with blocks can be solved by
introducing a way to leave the current block and resume it elsewhere.
I'll demonstrate it assuming there is a pause/cont combination. For
these examples to work, pause needs to take effect after the entire
statement it&#x
