Re: one more nice2haveit

2001-07-18 Thread jh_lists
> I've go tired of typing :"), but if I had current index-iterator ( say under > $i just as example) at hand the way I have $_ i can just type : > > print "$_ : $b[$i]\n" for @a; > OR > print "$a[$i] : $b[$i]\n" for @a; > For a general solution to this see Buddha Buck's RFC on iterators:

RE: one more nice2haveit

2001-07-18 Thread Sterin, Ilya
How about print "$a[$_]:$b[$_] for 0..$#a; or in the p6 case... print "@a[$_]:@b[$_]" for 0..$#a; Ilya -Original Message- From: raptor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07/18/2001 12:14 PM Subject: one more nice2haveit hi, As I was programming i got again to one thing i

one more nice2haveit

2001-07-18 Thread raptor
hi, As I was programming i got again to one thing i alwas needed to have... especialy when write something fast or debug some result... words comes about for/foreach and accessing the current-index of the array I'm working with i.e. say I have two arrays @a and @b and want to print them (al