> On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:27:43 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>
> >David L. Nicol wrote:
> >> eval ${code}o;
> >
> >Another brilliant idea from David Nicol!
>
> Not really.
>
> What I would like is an option to just *compile* a piece of perl code,
> without executing it. This kinda works:
>
>$
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:27:43 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>David L. Nicol wrote:
>> eval ${code}o;
>
>Another brilliant idea from David Nicol!
Not really.
What I would like is an option to just *compile* a piece of perl code,
without executing it. This kinda works:
$coderef = eval "su
> David L. Nicol wrote:
> > eval ${code}o;
>
> Another brilliant idea from David Nicol!
>
> However, I'm not keen on the syntax.
> I'd rather see a different keyword. I'm thinking "eval1",
> but I'm not very creative. :-/
]- what about :
qe//;# qe{};
OR
qo//
David L. Nicol wrote:
> eval ${code}o;
Another brilliant idea from David Nicol!
However, I'm not keen on the syntax.
I'd rather see a different keyword. I'm thinking "eval1",
but I'm not very creative. :-/
--
John Porter
Science class should not end in tragedy.