> "LP" == Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> on boston.pm a thread arose about having named subs inside subs. of
>> course perl5 can do it but they don't do anything useful but they do
>> have some odd implemenation defined closure behavior.
>>
>> someone brought up lisp and
> on boston.pm a thread arose about having named subs inside subs. of
> course perl5 can do it but they don't do anything useful but they do
> have some odd implemenation defined closure behavior.
>
> someone brought up lisp and scheme and how they do it (differently from
> each other).
>
> well,
on boston.pm a thread arose about having named subs inside subs. of
course perl5 can do it but they don't do anything useful but they do
have some odd implemenation defined closure behavior.
someone brought up lisp and scheme and how they do it (differently from
each other).
well, i want to dred
