On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:46:25AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: With an array
: match, you might find yourself redispatching individual operators in a
: switch statement to provide that kind of specificity.
In particular, macros with "is parsed" will want to have a place to
hang their special parse
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:49:33AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Michele Dondi writes:
: > On the wild side of things, could there be the possibility of even
: > defining new ones?
:
: That's what I meant by:
:
: grammatical_category:postcircumfix
:
: Though it wouldn't be so magical as to jus
Michele Dondi writes:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> > > Are there others, aside from these: ?
> > >
> > > prefix: a unary prefix operator
> > > infix: a binary infix operator
> > > postfix:a binary suffix operator
> > > circumfix: a bracketing operato
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Are there others, aside from these: ?
> >
> > prefix: a unary prefix operator
> > infix: a binary infix operator
> > postfix:a binary suffix operator
> > circumfix: a bracketing operator
>
> Tons. From A12:
[snip]
On the
David Storrs writes:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:39:07PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Matija Papec writes:
> > >
> > > Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old
> > > days ($hash{MYKEY})?
> >
> > Of course there's a way to do it. This is one of those decisions th
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:39:07PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Matija Papec writes:
> >
> > Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old
> > days ($hash{MYKEY})?
>
> Of course there's a way to do it. This is one of those decisions that I
> was against for the longest
Matija Papec writes:
>
> Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old
> days ($hash{MYKEY})?
>
> imho %hash<> at first sight resembles alien ship from
> Independence day. :)
Of course there's a way to do it. This is one of those decisions that I
was against for the
