Larry Wall wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
> : Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : : Why not do it the same way that namespace scoping collisions are
> : : resolved: the local scope trumps the caller's scope. Rinse, lather,
> : : repeat.
>
> Actually, I didn't see that you said "caller's scope". That would im
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:21:10PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: : Why not do it the same way that namespace scoping collisions are resolved:
: : the local scope trumps the caller's scope. Rinse, lather, repeat.
Actually, I didn't se
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Naming in what way? As a descriptive term for discussing them in general,
: or naming individual collections for reference purposes in the code?
I meant naming primarily as in how you select a particular group of them.
They don't
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : > Arguably, the role's might be required to declare their methods
> : > "multi" if they want to participate in this, but that's one of those
> : > things that feel like they ought to be declared by the user rather
> : > than the definer. On the other h
