On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:49:51AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
> David> I was primarily addressing the issue of the P5P allowing the
> David> language to be controlled by corporate presence through a
> David> purchased pumking, and not taking responsibility for the
> David> language suffic
> "David" == David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> I was primarily addressing the issue of the P5P allowing the
David> language to be controlled by corporate presence through a
David> purchased pumking, and not taking responsibility for the
David> language sufficient to protect it ag
> *All* communities have this. It's the nature of people. Pretending it might
> be otherwise is to paint a rather pleasant utopian fantasy that,
> unfortunately, can't exist. (At least not one that has people in it) It's
> one of the common failings of people involved in open source projects.
> As
Okay, followups to this belong in -meta (alas Eudora doesn't let you set
reply-to's, or I would), so if everyone would, please?
At 12:14 PM 10/1/00 -0500, David Grove wrote:
>On Sunday, October 01, 2000 4:02 PM, Jean-Louis Leroy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>wrote:
> > > The Perl-KGB-elite has got t
On Sunday, October 01, 2000 4:02 PM, Jean-Louis Leroy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> > The Perl-KGB-elite has got to go, and a free republic must replace
> > it.
>
> I wouldn't go as far as your entire post, neither in form nor content,
> but I do have concerns about the sociopsycho(patho)logy
