On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:28:29PM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote:
>
> --- Garrett Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm... Out of curiosity what kind of user-extensible topicalizer
> > aware constructs would you make?
>
> Remember Larry's comment that the -> operator is a kind of "parame
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:30:00PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote:
>
> Hmm... Out of curiosity what kind of user-extensible topicalizer aware
> constructs would you make?
I'm envisioning something along the lines of: while parsing a file, you
have a C loop through the file and a series of subrouti
--- Garrett Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Allison Randal wrote:
> > Garrett Goebel wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess the next question in the context of the following is:
> > >
> > > Larry Wall wrote in Apocalypse 4:
> > > >
> > > > It should be possible to make user-extensible syntax look
> > >
Allison Randal wrote:
> Garrett Goebel wrote:
> >
> > I guess the next question in the context of the following is:
> >
> > Larry Wall wrote in Apocalypse 4:
> > >
> > > It should be possible to make user-extensible syntax look
> > > just like built-in syntax.
> >
> > How would I create a user-
