"Buddha Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mr. Nobody wrote:
>
>> If you and Damian think you'll get me to leave p6l this easily,
>> forget it.
>> I've seen far worse flames than that.
>
> While you were the person that Damian lost his sense of humor at,
> Piers didn't identify you in this part o
Mr. Nobody wrote:
If you and Damian think you'll get me to leave p6l this easily, forget it.
I've seen far worse flames than that.
While you were the person that Damian lost his sense of humor at, Piers
didn't identify you in this part of the summary. So I don't think Piers
was trying to ge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rafael Garcia-Suarez earned at least one giggle when he
> suggested that we just needed "v~" "^~" and we had our
> own flavour of Befunge.
I promise: Lyon.pm does _not_ earn anything from Chris Pressey [0] in
order to support Befunge! :-)
Jerome
[0] Chris Pressey is
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> L2R/R2L syntax
> Argh! No! It's back and this time it means business. The dreaded
> left->right versus right->left thing came back, and this time it was
> Damian applying the electrodes to the corpse. Of course, it being
> Damian
> he was instantly f
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030112
... and we're back. Yup, it's summary time again. We'll dive straight in
with perl6-internals (as if you expected anything else).
More thoughts on DOD
Leopold Tötsch posted a test program showing the effects of PMC size and
timing o
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan-04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Damian Conway wrote:
>>
>> >Piers Cawley wrote:
>> >
>> >>Acknowledgements
>> >
>> >But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6
>> >summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through
On Jan-04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Damian Conway wrote:
>
> >Piers Cawley wrote:
> >
> >>Acknowledgements
> >
> >But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6
> >summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through the morasses
> >that are P6-language and P6-intern
Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley wrote:
>
>>* Thanks to everyone who has given me feedback as a result of these
>>summaries. It's really good to know that people finding these things
>>useful.
>>
> Me too. I find I no longer read the list because I c
Piers Cawley wrote:
* Thanks to everyone who has given me feedback as a result of these
summaries. It's really good to know that people finding these things
useful.
Me too. I find I no longer read the list because I can pick up the few
relevant bits from the summary
and fo
Damian Conway wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Acknowledgements
But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6
summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through the morasses
that are P6-language and P6-internals
Remembering e.g. perl6 operator threads, brrr, I
Piers Cawley wrote:
Acknowledgements
But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6
summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through the morasses
that are P6-language and P6-internals, endlessly straining out the essentials
for the benefit of those in the Perl
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20021229
This is not your normal summary. It's been Christmas, things have been
quiet, I've been concentrating on mince pies, roast goose and all that
other good stuff. Normal service will be resumed next week.
Acknowledgements
* Larry Wall
12 matches
Mail list logo